With Micrometastases in Melanoma, Complete Node Removal May be Unnecessary

When melanoma metastacizes, the lymph node to which it has spread is typically removed. But what if micrometastases are found in other nearby lymph nodes? Should patients undergo a complete dissection, or removal, of all the nodes in the area?

According to a recent study, patients can safely forgo that more invasive procedure, known as complete lymph node dissection (CLND), thereby avoiding the risk of debilitating side effects from the surgery.

Results of the phase 3 study1 were presented May 30 during the 2015 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), a gathering of nearly 30,000 oncology professionals in Chicago.

The study found no differences in several key survival outcomes among 483 patients with stage 3 melanoma and a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy who were randomized to observation only versus CLND. The study did detect a higher 14.6 percent rate of lymph node regional metastases among the observation group, compared with 8.3 percent in the CLND group.

“This is the first study which tested the general recommendation of complete lymphadenectomy in patients with positive nodes,” lead author Claus Garbe, a professor of dermatology at the University of Tübingen in Germany, said during an ASCO press briefing. “We cannot confirm this recommendation, and we expect that the practice will change.”

The study focused on patients with micrometastases; the researchers would continue to recommend CLND for patients with larger, clinically detectable macrometastases.

Lynn M. Schuchter, a melanoma specialist who served as an expert ASCO commentator at the briefing, said the trial is an important study that helps elucidate how to manage patients with a lower risk of recurrence, but that more evidence is needed for a broad change in current practice.

She said the standard of care currently is to perform CLND if positive sentinel lymph nodes are found through mapping, but that clinicians are increasingly questioning whether the second procedure is needed, “especially if there is microscopic lymph node involvement.”

“It’s a relatively small study, and I don’t think we would make a complete change in our recommendations yet based upon this study,” Schuchter said. “I think we’ll wait in terms of making definitive changes in our management with the results of another larger study.”

For patients, the questions the trial posed have significant implications. The risks of CLND include infection and nerve damage. Lymphedema can occur in more than 20 percent of patients and persist long-term in 5 percent to 10 percent of patients, ASCO said in a statement.

Garbe and colleagues, who conducted their study through the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group in Germany, sought to determine whether there would be a ≥10 percent survival difference between CLND and observation among patients who had positive sentinel node biopsies. Participants in the observation group were monitored with a lymph node ultrasound every three months and additional imaging tests every six months. Patients in the CLND cohort were monitored on the same schedule after their surgery.

Like (0)